Sorry Mrs. Curmudgeon.
Obama has run a terrific campaign, with an inspirational message that has gotten many truly excited for the first time in ages. It's been a long road so far and he hasn't stumbled.
To be sure, there are risks in nominating Obama, as there are in nominating Senator Clinton. We believe Obama will match up better against McCain this fall than will Hillary. It will be a battle for independent voters, and Hillary just doesn't turn them on (other than blue collar women--and they are important).
We do worry about the Hispanic vote with Obama, but believe he can make inroads with that demographic by November. (Obama/Richardson, anyone?)
Obama is a more convincing candidate for change than Hillary--although we do subscribe to the notion that both represent significant change.
We've found this a surprisingly tough choice to make, but we think it's the right decision.
2 comments:
Good choice. Hillary lost a chance at my vote when she decided the FL and MI delegates should be seated, after all the candidates agreed not to make any meaningful effort in either state.
Unfortunately, she is also less likely to reverse the Bush admin's many expansions of executive power and intrusions into our privacy.
Obama can unite us, and hope he can pull it off.
Where does Mrs. Favorite Uncle D and Favorite Uncle D's college daughter come out on the issue?
Post a Comment