Showing posts with label Hawaii republican caucus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hawaii republican caucus. Show all posts

Friday, January 25, 2008

Hawaii Republicans Begin Caucusing Today

In Hawaii, they do things differently, generally having more fun while at it.

When it comes to the Republican presidential nomination, the Hawaiian GOP is hosting caucuses, like many other states, except that they will start today and won't end until February 5. As with Louisiana, attendees at the Hawaiian caucuses won't be asked to state a presidential preference (although some districts plan to hold "fun, secret" straw polls that won't be released to the public--but no doubt will be posted by some blogger or another).


Instead, attendees will vote for specific delegates to the state convention, some of whom may be uncommitted, others of whom may be openly supporting a candidate, such as Ron Paul. (Paul supporters have been organizing themselves to attend caucuses across the country, with a fair amount of success--and some frustration.)


It will be pretty difficult to which candidate, if any, gets a leg up on Hawaii's 20 delegates to the GOP national convention, and since the Hawaii state convention isn't until May, we won't know for some time. The good news for Hawaiians: maybe no candidate will be over the top by May and Hawaii can be a Kingmaker. (Although we are increasingly thinking the prospect of a deadlocked convention is less likely, unless Giuliani pulls a rabbit out of a hat next Tuesday.)

Monday, January 21, 2008

Curmudgeon Clarification on Lousiana and Hawaii GOP Caucuses

Spurred by one of our commenters, we took a closer look at the Lousiana and Hawaii Republican caucuses that take place next week, before Florida, but are being ignored by the Mainstream Media and even sophisticated pundits.

Having looked more closely, we can see why they're being ignored--both are so complicated and/or unusual that they are difficult to follow.

First, Louisiana: Next Tuesday, Louisiana Republicans will hold a closed caucus--i.e., open only to registered Republicans. The caucus will select delegates who, officially, will be "uncommitted." About half the delegates will not be allocated to any candidate until after a presidential primary selection process on February 9; the other half will remain "uncomitted"--however, each candidate will be running candidates for delegate who will support that candidate.

That's a simpler explanation than the way it really works, but it's good enough for here. The point is that it will be pretty difficult to parse at the end of the day on Tuesday who "won" because the caucus attendees won't be expressing a candidate preference. Nonetheless, someone (or ones) will walk out with a few delegates from the process, so the candidate whose campaign spends the time working it out can get something valuable from the process.

Hawaii is also weird because it's caucuses open next Friday, Jan. 25, but they go on through Feb. 5, at various locations. Thus, we won't really know who "won" Hawaii until Super Duper Tuesday, at which point the info won't be of much use in terms of anyone's momentum, etc.

Both the Louisiana and Hawaii selection process suffer from a not too uncommon Republican Party trait: paranoia. Worried that independents (heaven forbid) or even not particularly politically active or acute registered party member will get involved in the selection process, the GOP in some states erects elaborate procedures designed to make sure that only the party faithful have a say in the outcome. These are kind of mini-brokered affairs.

McCain, who does well with independents and moderate Republicans (who increasingly are frozen out of party leadership) presumably is at a disadvantage in these contests. Romney is at an advantage because of his extensive organization. Huckabee could be at an advantage given the disproportionate influence of evangelicals in these things, but he suffers from disorganization.

In any event, we'll be a little less critical of the MSM for its failure to cover these contests. The Curmudgeon, however, will do its best to check on what's happening with them and factor them into the larger picture.